Financial analysis results
REF: RESULTS-2025

Analysis Work That Delivers Clarity

Our documented analytical approach has supported decision-making across 247+ engagements since establishing our practice.

Return Home
SECTION 2.1

Areas of Impact

Our analysis work supports clients across multiple dimensions of their evaluation and decision processes.

Investment Decision Support

Clients use our screening analyses to narrow opportunity sets from broad universes to focused candidate lists. The documented criteria application provides systematic evaluation supporting portfolio construction decisions.

Due Diligence Enhancement

Our financial statement analysis identifies areas warranting deeper investigation during acquisition or lending evaluations. The depth beyond surface metrics helps teams allocate due diligence resources effectively.

Competitive Context

Benchmarking studies position company performance relative to industry peers. This comparative perspective supports strategic planning, valuation work, and competitive assessment initiatives.

Internal Capacity Extension

Teams facing resource constraints use our services to maintain analytical depth during high-volume periods. Our work complements internal capabilities when specialized evaluation expertise is needed.

SECTION 2.2

Track Record

Quantitative measures reflecting our analytical work and client engagement patterns.

247+
Analyses Completed

Systematic evaluations delivered across screening, statement analysis, and benchmarking services since October 2019.

92%
Repeat Engagement Rate

Clients returning for additional analysis work, indicating satisfaction with methodology and deliverable quality.

14
Average Days to Delivery

Typical turnaround from engagement start to deliverable completion for standard scope assignments.

Client Sectors

Asset Management 38%
Private Equity 29%
Corporate Development 21%
Lending Groups 12%

Industry Coverage

Technology 32%
Healthcare 24%
Industrials 19%
Financial Services 25%
SECTION 2.3

Methodology in Practice

Representative examples demonstrating how our analytical framework addresses different evaluation scenarios.

A

Healthcare Technology Screening

September 2024

Challenge

Asset manager needed to narrow 200+ healthcare IT companies to 15-20 detailed research candidates. Client lacked internal capacity during peak evaluation period.

Approach

Applied client-defined criteria covering growth metrics, profitability trajectory, and addressable market characteristics. Systematic evaluation with documented scoring methodology.

Outcome

Delivered ranked candidate list with summary profiles. Client advanced 18 companies to detailed research phase. Analysis completed within client's timeline requirements.

B

Industrial Manufacturer Financial Review

November 2024

Challenge

Private equity firm evaluating acquisition target required assessment beyond standard ratio analysis. Concern about earnings quality given complex inventory accounting.

Approach

Detailed examination of five-year financial statements focusing on inventory valuation, revenue recognition timing, and working capital trends. Quality adjustments documented with supporting calculations.

Outcome

Analysis identified specific areas for due diligence focus including inventory obsolescence provisions. Client used findings to structure information requests for management team.

C

Software Sector Benchmarking Study

October 2024

Challenge

Corporate development team required competitive positioning assessment for strategic planning. Needed defensible peer selection and consistent metric comparison.

Approach

Selected 10 peer companies based on product similarity, customer profile, and scale. Compared metrics including growth rates, margin profiles, and efficiency indicators across three-year period.

Outcome

Benchmarking tables showing relative positioning across key metrics. Client identified specific operational areas showing performance gaps versus leading peers.

SECTION 2.4

Typical Engagement Progression

Understanding what to expect from initial consultation through deliverable completion.

D1-3

Scope Definition

Initial discussion to understand your evaluation needs, timeline requirements, and deliverable expectations. We document scope details including analytical focus, data sources, and output format preferences. You receive a written proposal outlining methodology, timeline, and pricing for review without obligation.

Days 1-3: Consultation and proposal development
D4-10

Analysis Execution

Upon engagement, we begin systematic analysis according to documented methodology. Data collection, evaluation against criteria, and initial findings development occur during this phase. For complex assignments, we provide mid-point status updates to ensure alignment with your expectations.

Days 4-10: Primary analytical work period
D11-14

Deliverable Preparation

Analysis findings are structured into final deliverable format with supporting documentation. Quality review ensures calculations are accurate, sourcing is clear, and presentation meets professional standards. Draft deliverables are finalized incorporating any technical specifications discussed during scope definition.

Days 11-14: Documentation and quality review
D14+

Delivery and Follow-Up

Completed analysis delivered according to agreed timeline and format. We remain available for clarification questions about methodology or findings interpretation. Many clients return for additional analysis work on new evaluation needs, reflecting satisfaction with deliverable quality and analytical approach.

Day 14+: Ongoing relationship and future engagements
SECTION 2.5

Value Beyond Individual Engagements

Framework Adoption

Clients often incorporate elements of our analytical methodology into their internal processes. The documented criteria application and systematic evaluation approach can be replicated for future assessments. This knowledge transfer extends value beyond deliverable completion.

Decision Confidence

Thorough analysis work provides foundation for decisions that may influence portfolio composition or strategic direction for extended periods. The clarity gained from systematic evaluation supports conviction in implementation. Documented findings serve as reference material during execution phases.

Relationship Development

Our 92% repeat engagement rate reflects clients returning for additional analysis work as new evaluation needs arise. Ongoing relationships allow us to develop deeper understanding of client preferences and requirements, improving efficiency in future assignments. Many engagements span multiple years across different projects.

SECTION 2.6

Consistent Quality Factors

Elements contributing to reliable analytical delivery across engagements.

Documented Methodology

Systematic approach ensures consistency across analysts and time periods. Documented procedures reduce variability in evaluation work. Clients receive analysis following established standards regardless of specific engagement timing.

Quality Review Process

All deliverables undergo internal review before client delivery. Calculations are verified, sourcing is confirmed, and presentation quality is assessed. This quality control step reduces errors and maintains professional standards.

Professional Standards

CFA charter holder involvement ensures adherence to professional practice standards. Continuing education requirements maintain current knowledge of analytical techniques and industry developments.

Client Communication

Clear scope definition at engagement start establishes shared expectations. Status updates during analysis phase provide transparency. Post-delivery availability for questions supports proper interpretation of findings.

SECTION 2.7

Analytical Expertise Supporting Decisions

Since establishing our practice in October 2019, Axiom Insights has completed over 247 financial analysis engagements for clients across asset management, private equity, corporate development, and lending sectors. Our systematic methodology provides documented insights supporting evaluation and decision-making processes when depth beyond surface-level metrics is required.

The 92% repeat engagement rate reflects client satisfaction with analytical quality and deliverable utility. Organizations return for additional work as new evaluation needs arise, indicating that our framework provides value supporting their ongoing investment and strategic activities. This sustained relationship pattern demonstrates consistent delivery meeting professional standards.

Our analysts maintain CFA charter designations, ensuring adherence to professional practice standards and current knowledge through continuing education requirements. Combined 18 years of experience in financial analysis roles provides practical understanding of how evaluation work supports different decision contexts. Industry coverage spans technology, healthcare, industrials, and financial services sectors.

Location in München, Germany provides access to European markets while serving clients globally. Understanding regulatory frameworks and reporting standards across jurisdictions facilitates cross-border analysis work. Our documented methodology applies consistently regardless of geographic focus or industry sector being evaluated.

Three core services address different evaluation needs: Investment Screening Analysis for systematic opportunity identification, Financial Statement Analysis for depth beyond ratio calculations, and Industry Benchmarking Studies for comparative positioning assessment. Each service applies consistent analytical standards with transparent methodology documentation supporting internal review and validation processes.

SECTION 2.8

Discuss Your Analysis Requirements

Share your evaluation needs and we will respond with scope details, methodology explanation, and timeline estimates. No obligation consultation to determine if our approach aligns with your requirements.

Request Consultation